Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ekaterina Kazionova vs Anja Stankovic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kazionova vs Stankovic analysis and find out who is favored!
Ekaterina Kazionova vs Anja Stankovic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kazionova 0 - 0 Stankovic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kazionova has won 45.31% of points on their second serve, while Stankovic has won 47.11%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kazionova, in recent form, has won 59.97% of their opponent's second serve points, while Stankovic has won 57.18%. The same stats for first serve returns are 44% and 43.22% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kazionova has saved 50.78% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stankovic has saved 62.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kazionova has won 59.18% of matches played (W/L 29/ 20), with Stankovic winning 69.23% (W/L 45/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kazionova has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 110/ 69), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Stankovic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 60/ 29), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Kazionova has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.67% of matches (W/L 17/ 13), where as Stankovic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 77.08% of matches (W/L 37/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kazionova has played against opponents with an average rank of 108.61 while Stankovic has played against players with an average rank of 180.09.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kazionova has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stankovic has won 68% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kazionova has converted 52.03% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stankovic has converted 49.64% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
765
Rank
280
High
25
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
515
Rank
515
High
18
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
55% (232-189)
Career Total W/L
67% (62-31)
63% (17-10)
YTD W/L
77% (27-8)
$3,345
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ekaterina Kazionova | Anja Stankovic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (17/10) | 77% (27/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (38/22) | 69% (57/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (304/251) | 58% (427/309) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (6/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 64% (7/4) | 77% (27/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.11 | 0.35 |
| Aces Total | 29 | 124 |
| DFs per game | 0.37 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 101 | 111 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:23:25 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 51.26 | 141.94 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1108/1681) | 47% (976/2082) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (650/1108) | 69% (672/976) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (255/573) | 47% (521/1106) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (128/242) | 50% (137/276) |
| Return Pts W% | 50% (883/1759) | 48% (969/2015) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 64% (7/4) | 60% (3/2) |
| Futures W/L | 63% (10/6) | 80% (24/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (17/26) | 77% (27/35) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 77% (10/13) |
| 1st set W, W | 84% (19/16) | 92% (25/23) |
| 1st set W, L | 16% (19/3) | 8% (25/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 40% (10/4) |
Ekaterina Kazionova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Ekaterina Ovcharenko
Player
Ekaterina Kazionova
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ekaterina Kazionova
Player
Isabelle Cherny
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
0
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
7
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
47 of
95)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Ariana Geerlings
Player
Ekaterina Kazionova
78%
(
73 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
101)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
10
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
25%
(
5 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
56 of
101)
106
Total Points Won
88
|
6-7(7) 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ekaterina Kazionova
Player
Michaela Laki
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
22 of
36)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
25%
(
3 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ekaterina Kazionova
Player
Daria Kuczer
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
71%
(
47 of
66)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Kazionova
Player
Arina Bulatova
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
14
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
40 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
41 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daria Kuczer
Player
Ekaterina Kazionova
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
5-7 6-0 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Kazionova
Player
Arina Bulatova
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
67 of
105)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
35 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
55 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jiho Shin
Player
Ekaterina Kazionova
83%
(
62 of
75)
1st Serve %
77%
(
48 of
62)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Anja Stankovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Andreea Prisacariu
Player
Anja Stankovic
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve %
46%
(
44 of
95)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anja Stankovic
Player
Ana Giraldi Requena
51%
(
22 of
43)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
11
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Ariana Geerlings
Player
Anja Stankovic
77%
(
98 of
127)
1st Serve %
48%
(
53 of
110)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
5
59%
(
58 of
98)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
43%
(
55 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
110)
121
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(2) 6-7(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anja Stankovic
Player
Natalija Senic
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
74%
(
62 of
84)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
47%
(
40 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anja Stankovic
Player
Virginia Ferrara
47%
(
48 of
103)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
51%
(
28 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
45%
(
46 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anja Stankovic
Player
Jovana Grujic
48%
(
22 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anja Stankovic
Player
Prathyusha Rachapudi
49%
(
34 of
69)
1st Serve %
72%
(
43 of
60)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Anja Stankovic
Player
Daria Kuczer
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anja Stankovic
Player
Teodora Kostovic
42%
(
46 of
109)
1st Serve %
61%
(
70 of
114)
15
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
5
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
44 of
70)
41%
(
26 of
63)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
42%
(
46 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
114)
113
Total Points Won
110
|
4-6 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anja Stankovic
Player
Vicky Van De Peer
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Kazionova Vs Stankovic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
